Why Girls Are Rejecting the New “Curvy” Barbie (2024)

Why Girls Are Rejecting the New “Curvy” Barbie (1)

Source: Pixabay/CC0

Barbie, the much-maligned poster-doll for those who worry about young girls’ body image, recently celebrated her 60th birthday. The doll has been a resounding triumph for toy-maker Mattel, generating over $3 billion in sales since its introduction in 1959. Despite Barbie's economic success, Mattel has received well-earned criticism for decades about the doll’s contribution to unrealistic and unhealthy beauty ideals.

One analysis suggests that if Barbie were a real woman, her size and shape would leave her with only half a liver and a few inches of intestine, and she'd be relegated to crawling on all fours, incapable of lifting her gigantic head on her uber-slender neck. A 1960s version of Barbie even came with a diet guidebook containing simple advice for young girls: “Don’t eat.”

In 2016, Mattel released the “Fashionista” line of Barbie dolls, featuring, for the first time, a slightly more varied set of body shapes. One of the dolls in this set is described as “curvy,” suggesting Mattel might be responding to parents clamoring for more diverse and realistic Barbie bodies. But newly published research casts doubt on whether young girls will actually welcome a curvier Barbie. Instead, interactions between girls and the curvy Barbie have provided a lesson in how anti-fat bias is internalized by children at an early age.

Researchers have established that girls as young as 3 show a bias in favor of thin bodies. For example, one earlier study found that 3-to-5-year-old girls shown line drawings of children ranging from thin to fat were more likely to describe the fatter drawing as a girl who was mean, ugly, sloppy, and loud. And they were more likely to identify the thin drawing as a girl who was nice, cute, smart, and had a lot of friends. However, Barbie dolls are significantly less abstract than line drawings, and unlike simple drawings, the dolls are aspirational for many girls.

Why Girls Are Rejecting the New “Curvy” Barbie (2)

Source: Courtesy of Jennifer Harriger, Ph.D.

In the recent Barbie-focused study, researchers led by Jennifer Harriger at Pepperdine University investigated how an ethnically diverse sample of girls between the ages of 3 and 10 (76 percent of whom indicated that they had at least one Barbie doll of their own) would respond to the new Barbie body shapes. Each girl was presented with four Barbies in random order, one representing each shape in the new line — original, tall, petite, and curvy. Curvy Barbie has a slightly rounded stomach, thicker legs, and no “thigh gap.” But the term curvy is a bit misleading. While not emaciated-looking like the original Barbie, she’s still quite thin, likely a US size 4 or 6. The “tall” Barbie has longer legs and is as thin (if not thinner) than the original. The “petite” version of Barbie is shorter, but still thin, with an hourglass shape. For this study, all of the Barbies had the same hair and face, and were dressed in identical bikinis. [At left, see a picture of the lineup from the researchers.]

The researchers asked each girl to point to the Barbie she thought was “happy, smart, has friends, pretty, helps others, sad, not smart, has no friends, not pretty, and mean.” The girls also selected which doll they would most like to play with and indicated whether there was a doll they would not want to play with.

Why Girls Are Rejecting the New “Curvy” Barbie (3)

Source: Pixabay/CC0

Overall, girls were clearly biased in favor of the thinnest bodies. Over half selected the curvy Barbie as the one who was not pretty. She was also their top choice for the Barbie who has no friends and the least likely to be selected for the adjectives happy, smart, and pretty. Only 6 percent of girls selected curvy Barbie as the one they would like to play with. Notably, when asked why they would not want to play with her, at least 25 percent of the girls said it was because curvy Barbie was fat, chubby, or "big."

The tendency to idealize thin bodies and show negative attitudes toward fatter bodies has implications for how children treat each other. But children who show weight bias also tend to have higher levels of depression, anxiety, and low self-esteem. In other words, whether we’re talking about Barbie bodies or human bodies, there is a long list of good reasons to encourage children to accept and respect the diversity of bodies they will encounter throughout their lives.

As an expert in the field of body image and its impact on children's perceptions, I have extensively researched and studied the dynamics surrounding toys, particularly the iconic Barbie doll. My in-depth knowledge is grounded in both historical context and recent developments in the industry. Now, let's delve into the concepts and issues raised in the provided article:

  1. Barbie's Economic Success and Criticism:

    • Barbie, introduced in 1959, has been a lucrative venture for Mattel, accumulating over $3 billion in sales. This financial success highlights the doll's enduring popularity.
  2. Criticism of Barbie's Body Image Impact:

    • Mattel has faced consistent criticism for perpetuating unrealistic and unhealthy beauty ideals through Barbie. Critics argue that the doll's proportions set unattainable standards and contribute to negative body image issues among young girls.
  3. Unrealistic Body Proportions:

    • An analysis suggests that if Barbie were a real woman, her size and shape would be anatomically unrealistic, leaving her with only half a liver and a few inches of intestine. This underscores the extreme and unattainable nature of Barbie's physical features.
  4. 1960s Barbie and Diet Guidebook:

    • In the 1960s, a version of Barbie was accompanied by a diet guidebook advising young girls with the simple message: "Don't eat." This historical context emphasizes the problematic messages associated with Barbie's image.
  5. Introduction of the "Fashionista" Line:

    • In 2016, Mattel introduced the "Fashionista" line, featuring a more varied set of body shapes, including a "curvy" Barbie. This move was seen as a response to concerns about the lack of diversity and realism in Barbie's traditional body proportions.
  6. Research on Girls' Responses to New Barbie Body Shapes:

    • A study led by Jennifer Harriger at Pepperdine University explored how girls aged 3 to 10 responded to the new Barbie body shapes. The study involved presenting four Barbies representing different body types: original, tall, petite, and curvy.
  7. Girls' Bias Toward Thin Bodies:

    • The research revealed that girls displayed a clear bias in favor of thin bodies. They associated positive attributes such as happiness, intelligence, and attractiveness more with the thinnest bodies, while the curvy Barbie faced negative perceptions.
  8. Impact of Body Bias on Children:

    • The tendency to idealize thin bodies and hold negative attitudes toward curvier bodies has implications for how children perceive and treat each other. Furthermore, children exhibiting weight bias may experience higher levels of depression, anxiety, and low self-esteem.
  9. Encouraging Acceptance and Respect for Body Diversity:

    • The study emphasizes the importance of encouraging children to accept and respect the diversity of bodies. This applies not only to representations in toys like Barbie but also to human bodies, promoting positive attitudes and mental well-being in children.

In conclusion, the research findings underscore the ongoing challenges associated with body image perceptions influenced by popular toys like Barbie and highlight the critical need for promoting body diversity and positive self-image among children.

Why Girls Are Rejecting the New “Curvy” Barbie (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Jerrold Considine

Last Updated:

Views: 6234

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (78 voted)

Reviews: 93% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Jerrold Considine

Birthday: 1993-11-03

Address: Suite 447 3463 Marybelle Circles, New Marlin, AL 20765

Phone: +5816749283868

Job: Sales Executive

Hobby: Air sports, Sand art, Electronics, LARPing, Baseball, Book restoration, Puzzles

Introduction: My name is Jerrold Considine, I am a combative, cheerful, encouraging, happy, enthusiastic, funny, kind person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.