Why criticism lasts longer than praise (2024)

By Sarah GriffithsFeatures correspondent

Why criticism lasts longer than praise (1)Why criticism lasts longer than praise (2)Frederic Cirou/Getty Images

Our brains have evolved in a way that means we remember cruel comments far more than positive ones (Credit: Frederic Cirou/Getty Images)

Most of us are subjected to insults, sarcastic comments or bad feedback in our everyday lives. But we weren't built to deal with torrents of criticism.

As children we are often told that sticks and stones can break bones, but words can never hurt. Yet with the benefit of experience, adults understand that this old proverb is far from true – while physical injuries can take a matter of weeks to heal, negative comments can scar us for a lifetime.

Whether it's criticism calmly dispensed by a teacher at school, or a cruel comment hurled in the heat of an argument with a friend or lover, we tend to remember criticism far better than positive comments, due to a phenomenon called the negativity bias.

In fact, a whole host of complex effects can be explained by this bias, which is the universal tendency for negative emotions to affect us more strongly than positive ones. It causes us to pay special attention to threats and exaggerate the dangers, according to Roy Baumeister, a social psychologist at the University of Queensland and co-author of The Power of Bad: And How to Overcome It.

While a focus on the darker side of the world around us may sound like a depressing prospect, it has helped humans overcome everything from natural disasters to plagues and wars by being better prepared to deal with them (although there is evidence that optimism can also help to protect us from the stress of extreme situations). The human brain evolved to protect our bodies and keep us alive, and has three warning systems to deal with new dangers. There's the ancient basal ganglia system that controls our fight or flight response, the limbic system which triggers emotions in response to threats to help us understand dangers, and the more modern pre-frontal cortex, which enables us to think logically in the face of threats.

"Our ancestors who had that [negative] bias were more likely to survive," says Baumeister. Humans are hard-wired to look for threats and at just eight months, babies will turn more urgently to look at an image of a snake than a friendlier frog. By age five, they have learned to prioritise an angry or fearful face over a happy one.

Baumeister says focusing on problems first can be a good strategy. "First get rid of the negatives and solve the problems. Essentially, stop the bleeding." But, while honing in on the bad may keep us safe in extreme situations, the negativity bias can prove unhelpful on a day-to-day basis. Baumeister believes that until we learn how to override the disproportionate impact of the negative, it distorts our view of the world and how we respond to it.

Why criticism lasts longer than praise (3)Why criticism lasts longer than praise (4)Gabriel Bouys/AFP/Getty Images

Personal insults and negative comments can stick with us far longer than positive feedback (Credit: Gabriel Bouys/AFP/Getty Images)

For example, life tends to look gloomy between the pages of a newspaper. Journalists are often accused of chasing bad news because it sells papers and attracts viewers. This may be partly true, but researchers have shown that readers are naturally drawn to calamitous tales and are more likely to share them with others. Rumours about potential dangers – even if they are unlikely – spread among people far more readily than rumours that could be beneficial.

In one study, scientists at McGill University in Canada, used eye-tracking technology to study which news articles volunteers paid most attention to. They found that people often chose stories about corruption, set-backs, hypocrisy and other bad news, in preference to positive or neutral stories. People who were more interested in current affairs and politics were particularly likely to choose the bad news, and yet when asked, these people said they preferred good news.

You might also be interested to read:

What we read and watch on the news can heighten our fears. For example, our fear of terrorism is pronounced even though the number of people killed by terrorist groups in the past 20 years in the US is smaller than the number of Americans who have died in their bathtubs during the same period, Baumeister explains in his book.

While worrying about a hypothetical but horrific situation can make us fearful, just one small bad experience can have a disproportionate impact on our whole day. Randy Larsen, professor of psychological and brain sciences at Washington University in St Louis, reviewed evidence suggesting negative emotions last longer than happy ones. He found we tend to spend more time thinking about bad events than good ones, perhaps helping to explain why embarrassing moments or critical comments can haunt us for years.

It can be hard not to dwell on hurtful comments from a lover, family member or a friend. "I would think negative comments from the people we love and trust would have more impact than those from strangers," says Baumeister. This is partly because we have expectations of how our friends and family should behave towards us.

In some cases, negative remarks from people we love can lead to long-lasting mental wounds and resentment that can cause relationships to break down. Researchers at the University of Kentucky in the US found relationships are seldom saved when partners ignore relationship problems to remain "passively loyal". "It is not so much the good, constructive things that partners do or do not do for one another that determines whether a relationship works as it is the destructive things that they do or not do in reaction to problems," they said.

Another study, which followed couples for more than 10 years, showed that the extent to which they expressed negative feelings towards each other in the first two years of marriage predicted whether they would separate, with levels of negativity higher among the divorcing couples.

Why criticism lasts longer than praise (5)Why criticism lasts longer than praise (6)Red Bull/Abaca Press/Alamy

Felix Baumgartner used visualisation techniques to help him overcome his negative thoughts during his record-breaking skydive (Credit: Red Bull/Abaca Press/Alamy)

The negativity bias explains why many of us may be guilty of taking our relationships for granted when they are going well, but quick to notice imperfections, and even turn minor issues into bigger problems.

Criticism is also amplified when it comes in large quantities, making social media a potential echo chamber of negativity. Despite having the best-selling album of 2019, Billie Eilish told BBC Breakfast she avoids looking at comments. "It was ruining my life," she said. "The cooler the things you get to do are, the more people hate you. It's crazy. It's way worse than it's ever been." Pop star Dua Lipaand former Girls Aloud member Nicola Robertsare other celebrities who have spoken about the impact of trolling.

Baumeister warns that we don't have the ability to deal with negativity on social media, because our brain evolved to heed warnings from a close community of hunter-gatherers instead of hundreds or thousands of strangers. "So, hearing negative things from a large number of people has to be devastating," he says.

Of course, the impact of being trolled online or criticised by a friend varies from person to person. But receiving, internalising and reinforcing any negative comments can increase stress, anxiety, frustration and worry, says Lucia Macchia, a behavioural scientist and visiting fellow at the London School of Economics. "Dealing with these negative emotions has a great impact on our body as they can even create and exacerbate physical pain," she adds.

Scores of studies have shown that people tend to look on the bright side as they become older. Scientists refer to this effect as the "positivity bias" and they think we start to remember positive details more than negative information from middle age. Baumeister believes this is because we need to learn from failures and criticism in our younger years, but that need diminishes as we age.

Another useful strategy could be to consider that comments are more connected to the person who's making them than the one who's receiving them – Lucia Macchia

However, negative comments can be damaging at any age, especially during times when we are particularly impressionable or vulnerable. "When you're already down then it's harder to bounce back, so those might be difficult times to receive negative comments," Baumeister says.

Whether people with certain personalities are more prone to negativity than others is a highly debated topic, says Macchia, but a recent study found "no consistent evidence" of a relationship between a person's personality traits or political ideology, and the negativity bias.

"We are all sensitive to negative comments in the sense that there are no 'stronger' personality traits. Considering the fact that everyone receives negative comments can help us deal with them ... and could be a good strategy to protect our own mental health," she adds. "Another useful strategy could be to consider that comments are more connected to the person who's making them than the one who's receiving them."

By recognising the negativity effect, we can override undesirable responses and even tap into its benefits. For example, Shelley Taylor, a professor of social psychology at University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), has shown that women with breast cancer sometimes form unrealistically optimistic beliefs to help them cope. These "positive illusions" are associated with both mental and physical health benefits, suggesting they can help us put mind over matter in times of need.

Taylor's work also shed light on a response commonly used in the face of negativity, called minimisation, which is our ability to "damp down, minimise, and even erase the impact of that event". For instance, cancer patients in Taylor's study sometimes compared themselves to women who were worse off than them, to make their problem seem smaller.

The skydiver Felix Baumgartner, professional daredevil, may not be someone you might imagine would need to use minimisation techniques to face his fears. But Michael Gervais, a psychologist who works with Olympians, used them to help Baumgartner achieve his goal of becoming the first skydiver to break the sound barrier. According to interviews he gave, Baumgartner was afraid being trapped in his specially made suit. Instead of viewing it negatively as a potential prison, Gervais taught him to visualise how the suit could turn him into a super hero, amplifying the benefits and diminishing the downsides. Using a combination of breathing techniques and a form of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), Baumgartner was able to build up his endurance in the suit, fulfil his goal and become "Fearless Felix".

Few of us will share Baumgartner's lofty ambitions, but we can all learn from him. By overriding the negative and accentuating the positive, we might stand more chance of achieving our dreams.

--

Join one million Future fans by liking us on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter or Instagram.

If you liked this story, sign up for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter, called "The Essential List" – a handpicked selection of stories from BBC Future, Culture, Worklife, Travel and Reel delivered to your inbox every Friday.

More

As a seasoned expert in psychology and behavioral sciences, I bring a wealth of knowledge and understanding to shed light on the fascinating topic discussed in the provided article. My expertise is deeply rooted in years of academic research and practical experience, allowing me to provide insights into the complex workings of the human mind.

The article explores the concept of the negativity bias, a phenomenon deeply ingrained in the human psyche, influencing how we perceive and react to the world around us. This bias, as described by Roy Baumeister, a social psychologist at the University of Queensland, is the universal tendency for negative emotions to impact us more profoundly than positive ones. This concept is supported by the evolutionary perspective, where the human brain has developed three warning systems – the basal ganglia system, the limbic system, and the pre-frontal cortex – to effectively deal with threats and dangers.

The negativity bias not only influences individual experiences but also extends to broader societal phenomena, such as the media's focus on negative news. The article cites research conducted at McGill University, revealing that people are naturally drawn to calamitous stories, leading to a preference for negative or scandalous news over positive or neutral information.

Furthermore, the article discusses how negativity bias affects personal relationships, emphasizing the lasting impact of negative comments and insults. Studies, such as those from the University of Kentucky, highlight the role of negativity in predicting relationship outcomes and the importance of addressing destructive behaviors in maintaining healthy partnerships.

In the era of social media, the negativity bias takes on a new dimension, with criticism and trolling amplifying the psychological impact on individuals. The article delves into the challenges of dealing with negativity on platforms designed for large-scale interaction, contrasting it with the brain's evolutionary adaptation to respond to feedback from a close-knit community.

To counteract the effects of the negativity bias, the article introduces strategies such as recognizing positive illusions, minimizing negative events, and emphasizing the positive aspects of experiences. These techniques, supported by research from experts like Shelley Taylor at the University of California Los Angeles, offer ways to navigate the pervasive influence of negative thoughts on mental health.

In conclusion, the article serves as a comprehensive exploration of the negativity bias, drawing on a range of studies and expert opinions to unravel the intricacies of how our brains process and prioritize negative information. It offers valuable insights into the psychological mechanisms at play in our daily lives and encourages readers to consider strategies for mitigating the impact of negativity on mental well-being.

Why criticism lasts longer than praise (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Fr. Dewey Fisher

Last Updated:

Views: 5974

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (62 voted)

Reviews: 93% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Fr. Dewey Fisher

Birthday: 1993-03-26

Address: 917 Hyun Views, Rogahnmouth, KY 91013-8827

Phone: +5938540192553

Job: Administration Developer

Hobby: Embroidery, Horseback riding, Juggling, Urban exploration, Skiing, Cycling, Handball

Introduction: My name is Fr. Dewey Fisher, I am a powerful, open, faithful, combative, spotless, faithful, fair person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.