Forum
Skip to content
Short vs. long legs
Moderator: robbosmans
- Steel[CZ]
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 10:29 pm
- Location: Prague, Czech Republic
- Contact:
Contact Steel[CZ]
by Steel[CZ] on Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:53 pm
I noticed that quite many people on this forum says that they have long legs (in compare to their torso). Is in WW community more long-legged people than in normal population? (Strange question, I know )
I think 180 cm / 88 cm inseam could be consider as a average leg lenght. (0.49 ratio between legs and body). If it is wrong, correct me.
I read on some bike-fit page that american people have in average shorter legs than europeans. Is it true?
Last edited by Steel[CZ] on Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
by Weenie on Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:53 pm
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
Top
- HisRoyalThighness
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 8:45 pm
- Location: USA/Germany
by HisRoyalThighness on Tue Jan 09, 2007 7:15 pm
I´m 182cm with 90cm inseam, which makes for a ratio of about 0.49. I guess that if you ask someone if they think their legs are short, average, or long most people will answer based on absolute length rather than the ratio of total body heigth/inseam.
Die Grenzen meiner Sprache sind die Grenzen meiner Welt
Top
- carbonhuhn
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 12:36 pm
- Location: Gerolstein/Germany
- Contact:
by carbonhuhn on Tue Jan 09, 2007 7:18 pm
Iam 188cm and my legs are 91cm long.
I like long legs but its takes very long get get them thick.
(like TOM)
CARBON RULZ
Top
- The Master Cylinder
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 6:05 am
by The Master Cylinder on Tue Jan 09, 2007 7:22 pm
I found a formula for "normal" height:inseam ratio. The normal or average ratio is 2.2:1. For example if you are 176 cm tall, your inseam should be 80 cm. I'm 185 cm tall and my inseam is 93 cm. My ratio is 1.99. So I need a longer torso to be normal.
Top
- Steel[CZ]
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 10:29 pm
- Location: Prague, Czech Republic
- Contact:
Contact Steel[CZ]
by Steel[CZ] on Tue Jan 09, 2007 7:28 pm
I guess that if you ask someone if they think their legs are short, average, or long most people will answer based on absolute length rather than the ratio of total body heigth/inseam.
Oh, you are right. I meant the ratio of course. I don't know how to change the question now.
Top
- Steel[CZ]
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 10:29 pm
- Location: Prague, Czech Republic
- Contact:
Contact Steel[CZ]
by Steel[CZ] on Tue Jan 09, 2007 7:35 pm
The Master Cylinder wrote:I found a formula for "normal" height:inseam ratio. The normal or average ratio is 2.2:1. For example if you are 176 cm tall, your inseam should be 80 cm.
I'm 185 cm tall and my inseam is 93 cm. My ratio is 1.99. So I need a longer torso to be normal.
2.2 is too high IMO (0.49 is inverse 2.04). It also depends how people measure the inseam.
Top
by BmanX on Tue Jan 09, 2007 7:39 pm
I am 177.8 cm tall with an inseam of 81.28 so I am at .46 or 2.19 (which ever way we are reporting it)
As for thick legs, I do not have a problem with that.
Calves 46 cm
Thighs 69cm
Genetically cursed. I have never been able to touch my toes so flexibility is a problem that I work on all the time.
Top
by DaveS on Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:29 pm
I'm 168cm tall with an 83cm inseam. The ratio that I find more meaningful is height/inseam = 2.02 or the reciprocal is .494. I haven't read of many riders my size with longer legs.
A short inseam would be 5cm less, or a 2.15/.46 ratio.
Last edited by DaveS on Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
- yourdaguy
- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 3:25 am
- Location: Southern Indiana USA
- Contact:
Contact yourdaguy
Yahoo Messenger
by yourdaguy on Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:29 pm
Short for sure, my ration is 45.7. Actually, my upper legs are normal, my lower leggs are short.
For certain parts stiffer is more important than lighter.
Top
by etownfwd on Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:46 pm
170 tall, 75 inseam. 44.1 ratio.
At least I THINK I did it right... You'd think that someone who deals with numbers for their job might be able to do simple addition and subtraction!
Now, does that give me long legs or a long torso?
-efwd
Top
- Ramjm_2000
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:26 pm
- Location: US of A
by Ramjm_2000 on Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:57 pm
Ht: 175cm
Inseem: 81cm
Ratio 2.16
I've always considered myself to have short legs.
Top
by Weenie on Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:57 pm
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
Top
Jump to
- General
- ↳ Weight Weenies
- ↳ Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.
- ↳ Catch all // Gallery threads
- Discussion
- ↳ MTB
- ↳ Road
- ↳ Wheelsets & Tires (Road)
- ↳ Bike Travel, Cycling Tourism, Destinations & Events
- ↳ Cycling Kits
- ↳ Racing
- ↳ CX & Gravel
- ↳ Randonneurring, Bikepacking, Commuting, E-Bikes
- ↳ Training
- ↳ Cycle Chat
- ↳ For sale - Pictures are mandatory 22-3-13
- ↳ Wanted
- Misc
- Board index
- All times are UTC+01:00
- Delete cookies
- Contact us
01.01.1970:Jagwire Elite link cable review |
01.01.1970:Review: Elite Cannibal Bottle Cages |
01.01.1970:Giro Trans E70 review |
01.01.1970:Vittoria Rubino Pro 3 review |
01.01.1970:Specialized S-Works Power Test |
13.06.2020:The "Comfort" of Narrow Handlebars | |
14.01.2020:FAR Ventoux C5 Review | |
25.08.2019:Orange Seal, does it live up to it's fame? | |
14.03.2019:Tune Factory Visit February 2019 | |
02.01.2019:EE cycleworks brakes review |
© Weight Weenies 2023 - hosted by starbike.com
Imprint - Data Privacy Policy
Ride more - work less
We're using cookies in case to provide best-possible user experience. When you keep surfing on this site you agree with the cookie usage.
it's okay
As an enthusiast with a deep understanding of the topic, I can confidently discuss the concepts and ideas presented in the provided article. The discussion revolves around the relationship between height and inseam length in the context of cyclists, specifically focusing on whether individuals in the cycling community have longer legs compared to the general population. Let's break down the key points:
-
Height/Inseam Ratio:
- The discussion involves participants sharing their height and inseam measurements and calculating the ratio between them.
- Ratios such as 0.49, 2.2:1, and 1.99 are mentioned, with individuals expressing whether they consider their legs to be short, average, or long based on this ratio.
-
Average Leg Length:
- There's a mention of a perceived average leg length of 180 cm with an 88 cm inseam, suggesting a 0.49 ratio as a benchmark for average leg length in the context of the discussion.
-
Geographical Differences:
- A claim is made that Americans, on average, have shorter legs than Europeans, which prompts questions about the accuracy of such a statement.
-
Formulas for "Normal" Height/Inseam Ratio:
- The Master Cylinder shares a formula suggesting a "normal" or average ratio of 2.2:1, providing an example to illustrate the concept.
-
Personal Examples:
- Participants share their own height, inseam measurements, and ratios, contributing to the ongoing discussion.
- Examples include individuals with a height of 182 cm and a 90 cm inseam, resulting in a ratio of about 0.49.
-
Body Proportions:
- The idea that body proportions, specifically the length of the torso, play a role in determining whether an individual perceives their legs as short, average, or long is discussed.
-
Measurement Variability:
- There's acknowledgment that the perception of leg length can be influenced by how individuals measure their inseam.
-
Leg Thickness:
- A participant mentions a preference for long legs but notes the challenge of developing thickness in the legs.
-
Flexibility and Body Characteristics:
- Comments about genetic factors influencing leg characteristics, such as difficulties in touching toes and the importance of stiffness over weight in certain body parts.
-
Global Community Interaction:
- The discussion involves participants from various locations, including the USA, Germany, Czech Republic, and more, providing a diverse perspective on the topic.
In summary, the article delves into the intricacies of how cyclists perceive and discuss the length of their legs, considering ratios, geographical differences, body proportions, and individual examples to contribute to a broader understanding of the topic within the cycling community.