Short vs. long legs - Weight Weenies (2024)

every gram counts

Short vs. long legs - Weight Weenies (1)Short vs. long legs - Weight Weenies (2)

Short vs. long legs - Weight Weenies (3)

powered by

Short vs. long legs - Weight Weenies (4)

Join us on

Short vs. long legs - Weight Weenies (5)

Short vs. long legs - Weight Weenies (6)Short vs. long legs - Weight Weenies (7)Short vs. long legs - Weight Weenies (8)

sponsors

Short vs. long legs

Moderator: robbosmans

Post Reply

98 posts

Steel[CZ]
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 10:29 pm
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Contact:

Contact Steel[CZ]

by Steel[CZ] on Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:53 pm

I noticed that quite many people on this forum says that they have long legs (in compare to their torso). Is in WW community more long-legged people than in normal population? (Strange question, I know Short vs. long legs - Weight Weenies (9))

I think 180 cm / 88 cm inseam could be consider as a average leg lenght. (0.49 ratio between legs and body). If it is wrong, correct me.

I read on some bike-fit page that american people have in average shorter legs than europeans. Is it true?

Last edited by Steel[CZ] on Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top

Short vs. long legs - Weight Weenies (10)

by Weenie on Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:53 pm

Short vs. long legs - Weight Weenies (11)
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com

Top

HisRoyalThighness
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 8:45 pm
Location: USA/Germany

by HisRoyalThighness on Tue Jan 09, 2007 7:15 pm

I´m 182cm with 90cm inseam, which makes for a ratio of about 0.49. I guess that if you ask someone if they think their legs are short, average, or long most people will answer based on absolute length rather than the ratio of total body heigth/inseam.

Die Grenzen meiner Sprache sind die Grenzen meiner Welt

Top

Short vs. long legs - Weight Weenies (12)

carbonhuhn
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 12:36 pm
Location: Gerolstein/Germany
Contact:

Contact carbonhuhn

by carbonhuhn on Tue Jan 09, 2007 7:18 pm

Iam 188cm and my legs are 91cm long. Short vs. long legs - Weight Weenies (13)
I like long legs but its takes very long get get them thick.
Short vs. long legs - Weight Weenies (14) (like TOM) Short vs. long legs - Weight Weenies (15)

CARBON RULZ

Top

Short vs. long legs - Weight Weenies (16)

The Master Cylinder
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 6:05 am

by The Master Cylinder on Tue Jan 09, 2007 7:22 pm

I found a formula for "normal" height:inseam ratio. The normal or average ratio is 2.2:1. For example if you are 176 cm tall, your inseam should be 80 cm.

I'm 185 cm tall and my inseam is 93 cm. My ratio is 1.99. So I need a longer torso to be normal.

Top

brian
Posts: 349
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 11:52 am

by brian on Tue Jan 09, 2007 7:24 pm

180 cm and 93 cm

Top

Steel[CZ]
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 10:29 pm
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Contact:

Contact Steel[CZ]

by Steel[CZ] on Tue Jan 09, 2007 7:28 pm

I guess that if you ask someone if they think their legs are short, average, or long most people will answer based on absolute length rather than the ratio of total body heigth/inseam.

Oh, you are right. I meant the ratio of course. I don't know how to change the question now.

Top

Steel[CZ]
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 10:29 pm
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Contact:

Contact Steel[CZ]

by Steel[CZ] on Tue Jan 09, 2007 7:35 pm

The Master Cylinder wrote:I found a formula for "normal" height:inseam ratio. The normal or average ratio is 2.2:1. For example if you are 176 cm tall, your inseam should be 80 cm.

I'm 185 cm tall and my inseam is 93 cm. My ratio is 1.99. So I need a longer torso to be normal.

2.2 is too high IMO (0.49 is inverse 2.04). It also depends how people measure the inseam.

Top

BmanX
Posts: 3841
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 5:31 pm

by BmanX on Tue Jan 09, 2007 7:39 pm

I am 177.8 cm tall with an inseam of 81.28 so I am at .46 or 2.19 (which ever way we are reporting it)

As for thick legs, I do not have a problem with that.

Calves 46 cm
Thighs 69cm

Genetically cursed. I have never been able to touch my toes so flexibility is a problem that I work on all the time.

Top

Short vs. long legs - Weight Weenies (17)

occor
Posts: 825
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 5:22 am
Location: LA, CA

by occor on Tue Jan 09, 2007 7:54 pm

173cm height
80.5cm inseam
ratio: 46.5

...short legs for sure

Top

DaveS
Posts: 3862
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 1:26 pm
Location: Loveland Colorado

by DaveS on Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:29 pm

I'm 168cm tall with an 83cm inseam. The ratio that I find more meaningful is height/inseam = 2.02 or the reciprocal is .494. I haven't read of many riders my size with longer legs.

A short inseam would be 5cm less, or a 2.15/.46 ratio.

Last edited by DaveS on Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top

Short vs. long legs - Weight Weenies (18)

yourdaguy
Posts: 2204
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 3:25 am
Location: Southern Indiana USA
Contact:

Contact yourdaguy

Yahoo Messenger

by yourdaguy on Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:29 pm

Short for sure, my ration is 45.7. Actually, my upper legs are normal, my lower leggs are short.

For certain parts stiffer is more important than lighter.

Top

Short vs. long legs - Weight Weenies (19)

Ivan
Posts: 374
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2003 7:11 pm
Contact:

Contact Ivan

by Ivan on Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:32 pm

Height: 185 cm
Inseam: 94 cm appr.
Ratio: 50.8

Long legs, no denying it.

He ride a bike instead of a car I wanna be his friend
Golden Earring - Going to the run

Top

DB
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:09 am
Location: eastern pa

by DB on Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:32 pm

I am 183cm tall ,86.3 inseam.

ride, eat, sleep, repeat !

Top

etownfwd
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 1:19 am
Location: Central PA

by etownfwd on Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:46 pm

170 tall, 75 inseam. 44.1 ratio.

At least I THINK I did it right... You'd think that someone who deals with numbers for their job might be able to do simple addition and subtraction!
Short vs. long legs - Weight Weenies (20)
Now, does that give me long legs or a long torso?
-efwd

Top

Short vs. long legs - Weight Weenies (21)

Ramjm_2000
Posts: 524
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:26 pm
Location: US of A

by Ramjm_2000 on Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:57 pm

Ht: 175cm
Inseem: 81cm

Ratio 2.16

I've always considered myself to have short legs.

Top

Short vs. long legs - Weight Weenies (22)

by Weenie on Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:57 pm

Short vs. long legs - Weight Weenies (23)
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com

Top

Post Reply

98 posts

We're using cookies in case to provide best-possible user experience. When you keep surfing on this site you agree with the cookie usage.
it's okay

As an enthusiast with a deep understanding of the topic, I can confidently discuss the concepts and ideas presented in the provided article. The discussion revolves around the relationship between height and inseam length in the context of cyclists, specifically focusing on whether individuals in the cycling community have longer legs compared to the general population. Let's break down the key points:

  1. Height/Inseam Ratio:

    • The discussion involves participants sharing their height and inseam measurements and calculating the ratio between them.
    • Ratios such as 0.49, 2.2:1, and 1.99 are mentioned, with individuals expressing whether they consider their legs to be short, average, or long based on this ratio.
  2. Average Leg Length:

    • There's a mention of a perceived average leg length of 180 cm with an 88 cm inseam, suggesting a 0.49 ratio as a benchmark for average leg length in the context of the discussion.
  3. Geographical Differences:

    • A claim is made that Americans, on average, have shorter legs than Europeans, which prompts questions about the accuracy of such a statement.
  4. Formulas for "Normal" Height/Inseam Ratio:

    • The Master Cylinder shares a formula suggesting a "normal" or average ratio of 2.2:1, providing an example to illustrate the concept.
  5. Personal Examples:

    • Participants share their own height, inseam measurements, and ratios, contributing to the ongoing discussion.
    • Examples include individuals with a height of 182 cm and a 90 cm inseam, resulting in a ratio of about 0.49.
  6. Body Proportions:

    • The idea that body proportions, specifically the length of the torso, play a role in determining whether an individual perceives their legs as short, average, or long is discussed.
  7. Measurement Variability:

    • There's acknowledgment that the perception of leg length can be influenced by how individuals measure their inseam.
  8. Leg Thickness:

    • A participant mentions a preference for long legs but notes the challenge of developing thickness in the legs.
  9. Flexibility and Body Characteristics:

    • Comments about genetic factors influencing leg characteristics, such as difficulties in touching toes and the importance of stiffness over weight in certain body parts.
  10. Global Community Interaction:

    • The discussion involves participants from various locations, including the USA, Germany, Czech Republic, and more, providing a diverse perspective on the topic.

In summary, the article delves into the intricacies of how cyclists perceive and discuss the length of their legs, considering ratios, geographical differences, body proportions, and individual examples to contribute to a broader understanding of the topic within the cycling community.

Short vs. long legs - Weight Weenies (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Nicola Considine CPA

Last Updated:

Views: 6251

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (69 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Nicola Considine CPA

Birthday: 1993-02-26

Address: 3809 Clinton Inlet, East Aleisha, UT 46318-2392

Phone: +2681424145499

Job: Government Technician

Hobby: Calligraphy, Lego building, Worldbuilding, Shooting, Bird watching, Shopping, Cooking

Introduction: My name is Nicola Considine CPA, I am a determined, witty, powerful, brainy, open, smiling, proud person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.