Log in or Create account
to start your free trial of SparkNotes Plus.
By signing up you agree to our terms and privacy policy.
Don’t have an account? Subscribe now
Your PLUS subscription has expired
- We’d love to have you back! Renew your subscription to regain access to all of our exclusive, ad-free study tools.
Go ad-free AND get instant access to grade-boosting study tools!
Plato
- Study Guide
Unlock your FREE SparkNotes PLUS trial!
Sign up and get instant access to bookmarks.
- Ad-Free experience
- Easy-to-access study notes
- Flashcards & Quizzes
- AP® English test prep
- Plus much more
Already have an account? Log in
Core Ideas
Dialogue and Dialectic
Core Ideas Dialogue and Dialectic
The dialogue form in which Plato writes is more than a mere literary device; it is instead an expression of Plato’s understanding of the purpose and nature of philosophy. For Plato, philosophy is a process of constant questioning, and questioning necessarily takes the form of dialogue. Near the end of the Phaedrus, Socrates expresses his reservations about written texts, worrying that people will cease to think for themselves when they have someone else’s thoughts written out in front of them. Plato took it upon himself to write his thoughts down anyway, but he was careful not to write them in such a way that we could easily assimilate his thoughts rather than thinking for ourselves. Many of the dialogues reach no definite conclusions, and those that do generally approach those conclusions by casting doubts and examining possible counterarguments. Plato cannot be there in person to share his thoughts with us, but he wants to ensure that we think through them ourselves.
In keeping with this emphasis on dialogue form, Plato develops an increasingly complex conception of dialectic, or logical argument, as the engine that drives philosophical investigations. In the early dialogues, dialectic consists of Socrates cross-examining and refuting his interlocutors until he brings them to a state of perplexity, or aporia. Beginning with the Meno, Plato recognizes that dialectic can lead people not only to recognize their errors but also to positive discoveries, as Socrates does with the slave boy in Meno. Plato is sufficiently impressed with the possibilities of the dialectic that, in TheRepublic, he makes it the highest achievement of his rigorous education program. The Phaedrus introduces a more systematic version of the dialectic, seeing it as a matter of “division and generalization,” whereby we analyze concepts so as to understand the precise relations between them. This process of division and generalization becomes increasingly sophisticated throughout Plato’s works, and we witness advanced versions of it in the Parmenides and the Sophist.
PLUS
NotesSee All Notes
Default Note
Add your thoughts right here!
As an avid enthusiast of philosophical discourse and a seasoned scholar well-versed in the intricacies of Plato's works, allow me to delve into the core ideas presented in the article you've shared, specifically focusing on the concepts of Dialogue and Dialectic.
Plato's choice of the dialogue form is not merely a literary device but a profound expression of his understanding of the purpose and nature of philosophy. Philosophy, according to Plato, is a dynamic process of constant questioning, and this questioning inherently takes the form of dialogue. In the Phaedrus, Socrates, a central figure in many of Plato's dialogues, voices concerns about written texts, fearing that individuals might cease to engage in independent thought when presented with someone else's preconceived ideas. Despite this reservation, Plato committed his thoughts to writing, ensuring that his works didn't serve as mere assimilable doctrines but rather as stimuli for independent thought.
The dialogues often lack definitive conclusions, and even when they do, these conclusions are typically reached through the casting of doubts and examination of potential counterarguments. Plato's intent is not to dictate his ideas but to encourage readers to critically think through them, fostering intellectual autonomy.
Dialectic, Plato's tool for philosophical investigation, undergoes a nuanced evolution in his works. In the early dialogues, it involves Socrates challenging and refuting his interlocutors until they reach a state of perplexity or aporia. However, Plato expands the scope of dialectic in the Meno, recognizing its potential not only to reveal errors but also to lead to positive discoveries, as exemplified by Socrates' interaction with the slave boy.
The Republic marks a pinnacle in Plato's educational philosophy, where he elevates dialectic to the highest achievement in his rigorous educational program. The Phaedrus introduces a more systematic version of dialectic, framing it as a process of "division and generalization." This method involves the analysis of concepts to understand their precise relations, and it becomes increasingly sophisticated in later works like the Parmenides and the Sophist.
In essence, Plato's emphasis on dialogue and the evolution of dialectic underscores his commitment to fostering independent thought and rigorous intellectual inquiry, ensuring that philosophy remains a dynamic, ever-questioning process.
