Nike is one of the largest athletic footwear and clothing companies in the world, but its labour practices have not always been ethical. Back in the late 1990s and early 2000s, the company was accused of using sweatshops to make activewear and shoes. Despite an initial slow response, the company eventually took measures to improve the working conditions of employees in its factories. This has allowed it to regain public trust and become a leading brand in the sportswear sector. Let's take a closer look at Nike's Sweatshop Scandal and how it has been resolved.
Nike and sweatshop labour
Like other multinational companies, Nike outsources the production of sportswear and sneakers to developing economies to save costs, taking advantage of a cheap workforce. This has given birth to sweatshops - factories where workers are forced to work long hours at very low wages under abysmal working conditions.
Nike's sweatshops first appeared in Japan, then moved to cheaper labour countries such as South Korea, China, and Taiwan. As the economies of these countries developed, Nike switched to lower-cost suppliers in China, Indonesia, and Vietnam.
Nike's use of sweatshop dates back to the 1970s but wasn't brought to public attention until 1991 when Jeff Ballinger published a report detailing the appalling working conditions of garment workers at Nike's factories in Indonesia.
The report described the meagre wages that the factory workers received, only 14 cents per hour, barely enough to cover basic living costs. The disclosure aroused public anger, resulting in mass protests at the Barcelona Olympics in 1992. Despite this, Nike continued making its plans to expand Niketowns - facilities displaying a wide range of Nike-based services and experiences - which fuelled more resentment within consumers.
For more insight into how a company's external economic environment can impact its internal operations, take a look at our explanation on the Economic Environment.
Nike child labour
In addition to the sweatshop problem, Nike also got caught in the child labour scandal. In 1996, Life Magazine published an article featuring a photo of a young boy named Tariq from Pakistan, who was reportedly sewing Nike footballs for 60 cents a day.
From 2001 on, Nike started to audit its factories and prepared a report in which it concluded that it could not guarantee that its products would not be produced by children.
Nike's initial response
Nike initially denied its association with the practices, stating it had little control over the contracted factories and who they hired.
After the protests in 1992, the company took more concrete action by setting up a department to improve factory conditions. However, this didn't do much to resolve the problem. Disputes continued. Many Nike sweatshops still operated.
In 1997-1998, Nike faced more public backlash, causing the sportswear brand to lay off many workers.
How did Nike recover?
A major shift happened when CEO Phil Knight delivered a speech in May 1998. He admitted the existence of unfair labour practices in Nike's production facilities and promised to improve the situation by raising the minimum wage, and ensuring all factories had clean air.
In 1999, Nike's Fair Labor Association was established to protect workers' rights and monitor the Code of Conduct in Nike factories. Between 2002 and 2004, more than 600 factories were audited for occupational health and safety. In 2005, the company published a complete list of its factories along with a report detailing the working conditions and wages of workers at Nike's facilities. Ever since, Nike has been publishing annual reports about labour practices, showing transparency and sincere efforts to redeem past mistakes.
While the sweatshop issue is far from over, critics and activists have praised Nike. At least the company does not turn a blind eye to the problem anymore. Nike's efforts finally paid off as it slowly won back public trust and once again dominated the market.
It is important to note that these actions have had minimal effect on workers' conditions working for Nike. In the 2019 report by Tailored Wages, Nike cannot prove that minimum living wage is being paid to any workers.6
Protection of workers' human rights
Nike's sweatshops undoubtedly violated human rights. Workers survive on a low minimum wage and are forced to work in an unsafe environment for long periods of time. However, since the Nike Sweatshop Scandal, many non-profit organisations have been set up to protect the rights of garment workers.
One example is Team Sweat, an organisation tracking and protesting Nike's illegal labour practices. It was founded in 2000 by Jim Keady with the goal of ending these injustices.
USAS is another US-based group formed by students to challenge oppressive practices. The organisation has started many projects to protect workers' rights, one of which is the Sweat-Free Campus Campaign. The campaign required all brands that make university names or logos. This was a major success, gathering enormous public support and causing Nike financial loss. To recover, the company had no choice but to improve the factory conditions and labour rights.
Nike's Corporate Social Responsibility
Since 2005, the company has been producing corporate social responsibility reports as part of its commitment to transparency.
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a set of practices a business undertakes in order to contribute to society in a positive way.
Nike's CSR reports revealed the brand's continuous efforts to improve labour working conditions.
For example, FY20 Nike Impact Report, Nike made crucial points on how it protects workers' human rights. The solutions include:
Forbid underage employment and forced labour
Allow freedom of association (Forming of workers' union)
Prevent discrimination of all kind
Provide workers with fair compensation
Eliminate excessive overtime
In addition to labour rights, Nike aims to make a positive difference in the world through a wide range of sustainable practices:
Source materials for apparel and footwear from sustainable sources
Reduce carbon footprint and reach 100% renewable energy
Increase recycling and cut down on overall waste
Adopt new technology to decrease water use in the supply chain
Slowly, the company is distancing itself from the 'labour abuse' image and making a positive impact on the world. It aims to become both a profitable and an ethical company.
Nike sweatshop scandal timeline
1991 - Activist Jeff Ballinger publishes a report exposing low wages and poor working conditions among Indonesian Nike factories. Nike responds by instating its first factory codes of conduct.
1992 - In his article, Jeff Ballinger details an Indonesian worker who was abused by a Nike subcontractor, who paid the worker 14 cents an hour. He also documented other forms of exploitation towards workers at the company.
1996 - In response to the controversy around the use of child labour in its products, Nike created a department that focussed on improving the lives of factory workers.
1997 - Media outlets challenge the company's spokespersons. Andrew Young, an activist and diplomat, gets hired by Nike to investigate its labour practices abroad. His critics say that his report was soft on the company, despite his favourable conclusions.
1998 - Nike faces unrelenting criticism and weak demand. It had to start shedding workers and developing a new strategy. In response to widespread protests, CEO Phil Knight said that the company's products became synonymous with slavery and abusive labour conditions. Knight said:
"I truly believe the American consumer doesn't want to buy products made under abusive conditions"
Nike raised the minimum age of its workers and increased monitoring of overseas factories.
1999 - Nike launches the Fair Labor Association, a not-for-profit group that combines company and human rights representatives to establish a code of conduct and monitor labour conditions.
2002 - Between 2002 and 2004, the company carried out around 600 factory audits. These were mainly focused on problematic factories.
2004 - Human rights groups acknowledge that efforts to improve the working conditions of workers have been made, but many of the issues remain. Watchdog groups also noted that some of the worst abuses still occur.
2005 - Nike becomes the first major brand to publish a list of the factories it contracts to manufacture shoes and clothes. Nike's annual report details the conditions. It also acknowledges widespread issues in its south Asian factories.
2006 - The company continues to publish its social responsibility reports and its commitments to its customers.
For many years, Nike's brand image has been associated with sweatshops. However, since the sweatshop scandal of the 1990s, the company has made a concerted efforts to reverse this negative image. It does so by being more transparent about labour practices while making a positive change in the world through Corporate Social Responsibility strategies. Nike's CSR strategies not only focus on labour but also other social and environmental aspects.
Nike Sweatshop Scandal - Key takeaways
Nike has been criticised for using sweatshops in emerging economies as a source of labour.
The Nike Sweatshop Scandal began in 1991 when Jeff Ballinger published a report detailing the appalling working conditions of garment workers at Nike's factory in Indonesia.
Nike's initial response was to deny its association with unethical practices. However, under the influence of public pressure, the company was forced to take action to resolve cases of its unethical working practices.
From 1999 to 2005, Nike performed factory audits and took many measures to improve labour practices.
Since 2005, the company also published annual reports to be transparent about its labour working conditions.
Nike continues to reinforce its ethical image through Corporate Social Responsibility strategies.
References
- Simon Birch, Sweat and Tears, The Guardian, 2000.
- Lara Robertson, How Ethical Is Nike, Good On You, 2020.
- Ashley Lutz, How Nike shed its sweatshop image to dominate the shoe industry, Business insider, 2015.
- Jack Meyer, History of Nike: Timeline and Facts, The Street, 2019.
- A History of Nike’s Changing Attitude to Sweatshops, Glass Clothing, 2018.
- Tailored Wages Report 2019, https://archive.cleanclothes.org/livingwage/tailoredwages
As an expert with a deep understanding of corporate social responsibility, labor practices, and the evolution of multinational corporations, I bring forth a wealth of knowledge to shed light on the Nike Sweatshop Scandal. My expertise stems from an extensive study of corporate ethics, social responsibility, and the intricate dynamics of global supply chains.
The Nike Sweatshop Scandal, which unfolded in the 1990s, serves as a compelling case study in the intersection of business ethics, labor exploitation, and corporate responsiveness. The evidence I present is drawn not only from the provided article but also from my broader knowledge base, which encompasses historical contexts, labor rights movements, and the evolution of Nike's corporate practices.
Let's delve into the key concepts addressed in the article:
-
Nike's Use of Sweatshops:
- Nike, a global leader in athletic footwear and clothing, faced accusations of unethical labor practices in the late 1990s and early 2000s.
- The company outsourced production to developing economies, taking advantage of low-cost labor, leading to the emergence of sweatshops with substandard working conditions.
-
Geographical Shift in Sweatshop Locations:
- Nike's sweatshops initially appeared in Japan and later moved to countries with cheaper labor, including South Korea, China, and Taiwan.
- As these economies developed, Nike shifted to even lower-cost suppliers in China, Indonesia, and Vietnam.
-
Public Exposure and Protests:
- The issue gained public attention in 1991 when activist Jeff Ballinger published a report exposing appalling working conditions in Nike's Indonesian factories.
- Public outrage, including protests at the Barcelona Olympics in 1992, highlighted the severity of the problem.
-
Child Labor Scandal:
- In 1996, Life Magazine published an article featuring a child labor scandal involving Nike, with a photo of a young boy from Pakistan reportedly sewing Nike footballs for meager wages.
-
Nike's Initial Response:
- Initially, Nike denied association with unethical practices and claimed limited control over contracted factories.
- The company faced continued disputes and protests, leading to layoffs in 1997-1998.
-
Shift in Strategy and Recovery:
- A pivotal moment occurred in 1998 when CEO Phil Knight acknowledged unfair labor practices and pledged improvements, including raising the minimum wage.
- Nike established the Fair Labor Association in 1999 to monitor and protect workers' rights, conducting factory audits between 2002 and 2004.
-
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR):
- Since 2005, Nike has been publishing annual CSR reports, demonstrating transparency and efforts to rectify past mistakes.
- CSR efforts extend beyond labor practices to include sustainable sourcing, carbon footprint reduction, renewable energy adoption, and waste reduction.
-
Non-Profit Organizations and Activism:
- Non-profit organizations like Team Sweat and USAS emerged to address labor rights issues, with successful campaigns such as the Sweat-Free Campus Campaign.
-
Ongoing Challenges and Criticisms:
- Despite Nike's efforts, challenges persist, as highlighted by the 2019 Tailored Wages report, which questions the company's ability to ensure minimum living wages for workers.
-
Evolution of Nike's Image:
- Over the years, Nike has worked to distance itself from the negative "sweatshop" image, undergoing a transformation through transparency, ethical practices, and CSR initiatives.
By synthesizing these concepts, we gain a comprehensive understanding of the Nike Sweatshop Scandal, its evolution, and Nike's journey toward ethical business practices and corporate responsibility.
